Add details to submit panel about acceptance criteria#5820
Merged
rtibbles merged 1 commit intolearningequality:unstablefrom Apr 13, 2026
Merged
Conversation
0402019 to
3ffe139
Compare
rtibbles
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2026
radinamatic
reviewed
Apr 13, 2026
| context: 'Label for the channel information checklist item in the channel fit checklist', | ||
| }, | ||
| channelFitChecklistIntro: { | ||
| message: 'Is your channel a good fit?', |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
'good fit' sounds too colloquial... This subheading should be simpler and more straightforward:
Criteria for submitting to the Community Library
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds description of community library evaluation/acceptance criteria and a little bit of helper text about countries per feedback from Laura
AI usage
I used claude for the test and string reference cleanup. I reviewed the code and did a lot of manual QA (as I came back from the brink with too much refactoring)